$MINomics Research Part 1: Exploring Tokenomic Models and Revenue Sources

  1. Governance Token: this type of token is purely a governance token, it is meant to give the holders the right to propose changes as well as to vote on Proposals to implement (or not) changes to the DEX. The token does not accrue any sort of fees, so one could say its exclusive utility is Governance. The best example for this type of token is Uniswap’s $UNI token.
  2. Revenue Sharing Token: this type of token accrues fees from the users swapping on the DEX. The revenue sharing works in the following way: for every swap on the DEX, traders pay a fee (normally, like in Minswap, it’s a 0.3% fee). A percentage of these fees (in Sushiswap’s case, half of the 0.3%, so 0.15%) gets redirected and instead of going to the Liquidity Providers, it goes to a Smart Contract.

    This Smart Contract sells the tokens received from the fees swappers pay, and uses that capital to consistently buy back the DEX’s token on the open market, which is then redistributed to token holders. This is what is known as “staking”. For example, in Sushiswap’s case, users will stake their $SUSHI token, and receive in exchange in a 1:1 proportion the revenue generating token (xSUSHI), which accrues more $SUSHI passively by using a percentage of swapper fees for buy-backs.
  3. Voting Escrow (“ve”) Token: pioneered by Stableswap Curve ($CRV), veTokens grant increased rewards and governance powers in the DEX to those who are willing to lock their tokens. Users lock their $CRV for veCRV, and the longer they lock their $CRV for, the more voting power they have and the bigger boost on LP Fees and $CRV Farming rewards they can reach. This incentivizes Liquidity Providers to become long-term stakeholders in the DEX protocol. The veToken Economics are a complex topic that would deserve a prolonged article of its own, but here is a great resource from Delphi Digital on that topic.
  • The staking doesn’t have any real purpose. The term staking originates from Proof-of-Stake networks where owners that stake their coins participate in functions necessary to the continued operation of the network, such as the validation of blocks. This is the case for instance for the staking of $ADA on Cardano. However, in the case of DEX tokens where one can stake to get more of the DEX token, the staking does not have any necessary function in the protocol. While by using Liquidity Mining programs, DEXs are essentially buying growth and TVL, by offering staking tokens, they do not benefit in any way, they are plainly paying holders for not selling their tokens in the short term, which is not an efficient or sustainable use of capital long term.
  • The idea that fees collected from swappers are used to buy the DEX token on the open market to increase the buying pressure and then given to stakers, is usually counterproductive. Because this means that for stakers, there’s no way to take profits from staking the DEX token except to just sell it. So, what happens is that once people start selling the DEX tokens obtained from staking for profits, sell pressure actually overtakes the buy pressure created by the buybacks.
  • LP Fees: currently, Protocol Fees are set at 0.3% for swapping on all Liquidity Pools. Profit Sharing could be turned on, which would mean 0.05% of swapping fees paid on the DEX would go to a profit sharing treasury, and the remaining 0.25% would go to LPs. The question is, once those tokens are in the profit sharing treasury, what should be done with them, and how should they be redistributed?
  • Batcher Fee: for every swap on the Minswap DEX, users pay a fixed fee of 2 $ADA. This $ADA is used fully to cover for the costs of running a relay network to enable the DEX to function. That being said, some efficiencies could be added, turning some of this operating cost into revenue, and redirecting a percentage of the $ADA obtained as revenue. An additional idea that has been proposed to add utility to the $MIN token, is to allow the use of $MIN to pay for the batcher fees, or give a discount on fees if you own a certain amount of $MIN.
  • Farming rewards from POL: currently, Minswap owns around 34.78% of the $MIN/$ADA Pool (6.7M $ADA and 94M $MIN), which is not being farmed. This Protocol Owned Liquidity (POL), could start farming, and all $MIN generated from it redirected as revenue. In addition, a recent focus of Minswap has been the Launch Bowl initiatives. With these initiatives, Minswap obtains a percentage of the resulting Liquidity Pool as a Fee, which increases and diversifies Minswap’s POL. For instance, after conducting a Liquidity Bootstrapping Event as a Service (LBEaaS) with “Project ABC” (ticker: $ABC), Minswap would obtain a percentage of the resulting $ABC/$ADA LP as a Fee, and could Farm both $MIN and $ABC as a result and redirect those rewards.
  • $ADA staking rewards: currently, all $ADA in the Minswap Liquidity Pools is staked in the Minswap (MIN) Private Pool, with the $ADA rewards going to the DAO treasury, as was voted here. However, the capability to redirect $ADA staking rewards to $ADA Liquidity Providers could be implemented. That being said, one could argue that even though $ADA staking rewards come from $ADA staked by LPs, these LPs get compensated in $MIN tokens, and thus a % of their ADA staking rewards could be distributed as revenue as well.



Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Minswap Labs

Minswap Labs


Minswap is the multi-pool decentralized exchange on the Cardano blockchain: https://minswap.org